<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Computational Creativity on George Ramzi's Blog</title><link>https://ramzi.uk/tags/computational-creativity/</link><description>Recent content in Computational Creativity on George Ramzi's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ramzi.uk/tags/computational-creativity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI in Education - Lecturing</title><link>https://ramzi.uk/posts/20260307_ai_in_education_lecturing/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ramzi.uk/posts/20260307_ai_in_education_lecturing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since ChatGPT&amp;rsquo;s launch in 2022, being an academic involved in marking has steadily become a more painful experience.
It&amp;rsquo;s quite hard sometimes pouring your energy into a module, into an assessment, and into marking, only to stumble across another report that is from a student you&amp;rsquo;ve never seen and you may never see again, who&amp;rsquo;s written a report that seems clearly written by an AI with no real understanding of your content, but in a way which you cannot prove.
Instead, without a smoking gun&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; you have to accept that the student has unprovably cheated and live with the fact they have probably got an unearned first.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>